What city do you think should get an NFL team ?

Question

Update:

Kathy, I didn’t consider SLC but yes you’re right. 

Answer 1

Favourite answer

Salt Lake City should get one.

Answer 2

San Francisco should get a team.  They don't have one anymore.  The 49ers are really the Santa Clara 49ers. 

Answer 3

Lincoln, Nebraska.

They could be called the Lincoln MiddleOfNowheres

Answer 4

Des Moines, Iowa. There's lots of sports fans in this state without any professional teams to root for. 

Answer 5

The NFL wants to move the Jaguars to London. But it will probably take awhile. 

One of the LA teams is going to move. There's not enough support for both of them. 

The largest cities without teams are San Antonio and San Diego. 

The largest metro areas are San Diego, St Louis, Orlando, San Antonio and Portland. 

I don't know about expansion anytime soon. They'll probably have to add 4 teams at the same time since 34 doesn't divide into equal division sizes. 

Answer 6

Hopefully an owner unlike the greedy  Chiefs Hunt who only thinks of money and not the safety of the fans attending tomorrows game .

Answer 7

I think you should open up the NFL. Create a league system with 7 or 8 levels and allow entries from all cities and towns based on sporting merit alone. Whoever makes the NFL should then be down to pure sporting merit and whoever can put together the best team, rather than which ever city hands the biggest brown paper bag to the NFL...

Answer 8

St. Louis and San Diego. Maybe Honolulu and Anchorage.

Answer 9

As always, it depends on investors and how they work with the cities on a stadium.  Putting those things aside, San Antonio, Orlando, Columbus, and San Diego are all good candidates based on the market size.  The last one has had an issue supporting team in general though.

Answer 10

Roswell NM so we can have an aliens team with fluorescent green and gray as the team colors and people can come dressed up like aliens and make the cars look like spaceships