Anonymous
Anonymous asked in News & EventsCurrent Events · 4 days ago

Why are non-whites such savages?

The Aztecs, Mayans, Incas etc sacrificed children on a massive scale until the horrified Spanish put a stop to it. For years, liberal academics claimed that the "racist" Spanish greatly exaggerated the scale of the slaughter, but recent discovery of several mass graves seems to show that the Spanish were simply describing what they saw. Also, the British were equally horrified when they discovered the widespread practice of suttee, or widow-burning. They succeeded in all but wiping it out but since independence, India has seen a rise in cases of this barbaric "custom".

37 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 day ago

    I think it is because through evolution white people have to use more brain power to survive during winter. I truly think it is as simple as that.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 days ago

    So why are there so many whites on the news being arrested? 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    3 days ago

    If the whites(especially the brits) hadn't impoverished the non-white parts of the world then there would be no such "current events".

    Can you Whites never recognize your fault ??

    Like when has +90% of whites ever accepted their mistake from their heart about any issue?

    This narcissistic behavior of not admitting and recognizing their mistakes is what makes whites so cold-hearted and harsh and not their savage history.

    And btw although  caste system is still prevalent in rural India there has not been even a single incidence of suttee in India  after independence

    And what about the 1943 Bengal Famine which killed 3 million

    The narcissist war-loving psychopath PM Winston Churchill diverted grain supplies from India for WWII and imposed wartime grain imports  *WHICH IS OK BCOZ MOST RULERS WHETHER WHITE OR NOT HAVE BEEN PSYCHOPATHS*

    But Brits never admitted that it was their fault

    However, the Chinese Communists admitted their mistake that because of their bad worker policies the famines happened

    Do you see the difference?

    Some myths they made vs REALITY

    Population

    The Brits complained that the population was too large to be helped and thus Winston didn't care to help them. However, after independence and some reforms, the population started growing faster than ever before, the government had little money and there were some terrible droughts but not a single famine did occur because of the T-R-U-T-H:  government policies that gave more importance to its people than the people living in the UK

    Panic-Hoarding

    A lot of Brits claimed that Indian landowners hoarded grains because of war speculation. However, the truth is that only 12% of Indians were literate at the end of 1947 (and thus probably some 8-10% in 1943 and on the internet I found out that literacy rate only started increasing after 1947 which indicates British Raj policies were also to blame for the illiteracy) and thus was just too illiterate to be aware of the real dangers of WWII and start preparing for it

    Adequate-Aid

    Even the majority of Brits admit it that Winston didn't do his best to stop the famine in India. However, there are always some select few who will deny this. Just read the reaction of the British Government below

    "What was unique in the 1873-74 famine was that there were 25 million people affected but low mortality due to famine, "This low mortality was due to food imports from Burma, and timely relief aid provided by the British government. Then Bengal lieutenant governor Richard Temple imported, distributed food, and relief money and that saved a lot of lives."The famine was over in 1874, with 17 percent of surplus monsoon rainfall and good food production. But Temple was heavily criticized by the British for over expenditure."

    Understand how much the Britishers cared about Indians?

    Japanese army

    The Brits claim that they had to focus more on the Japanese invasion rather than the famine and also claim that more people would have been killed had the Japanese invaded India. However, the Japanese were in the favor of Indian independence and even actively helped Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, India's Azad Hind Fauj's leader, and even have a statue or memorial of him in his country. So it rules any chances that Japan would have invaded India and made it its territory

    And finally the last myth

    Natural Famine

    Britishers have been claiming for long that it was a natural famine but researchers have proved using observations from weather stations and simulations with a hydrological model that estimated soil moisture content that the Bengal Famine was manmade

    According to the study:

    All but two of the famines were found consistent with the drought periods identified by the analysis. The exceptions were 1873-1874 and 1943-1944. The paper says there could be two reasons why the analysis did not identify these as drought periods — they were too localized, or the famine was caused by factors other than soil moisture deficits. For the 1873-1874 famine, which was localized to Bihar and Bengal, the paper concludes that it was the first of these two reasons. “Since the soil moisture drought in 1873 was centered on a relatively small domain, it was not identified by the… analysis,” it says.

    On the other hand, Mishra said: “The 1943 Bengal famine was not caused by drought but rather was a result of a complete policy failure during the British era.”

    Link: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/how-re...

    And there was poor healthcare, poverty, malnutrition to begin with which exacerbated the famine and these factors have been long known to be linked with British policies. For confirmation, just check the demographics of these factors before and after 1947

    HOPE U BRITS START REALIZING UR MISTAKES

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    3 days ago

    You can always tell the ones on here who are not entirely read-up on history. They tend to scream 'Yeah, centuries ago!' when the distasteful atrocities of whites are mentioned - like 'Oh...forget about it!'. And crimes from the early/mid last century, be it American killings of innocent blacks by the KKK or how (in Europe; Germany specifically) the new govt. wanted to do away with people of many origins and religion - again, with some on here who are shy with history telling us what happened between the thirties and mid forties never existed.

    If - as the asker tells us - 'non whites' are as 'savage' as he/she suggests, I'm sure this person should read up on the history of the West from the early 20th century onwards, and the relationship between the people who have been considered the top of the grade - and those who for centuries have been targeted for nothing more than the colour of their skin. As the century has moved on, they've shown the had had enough, as America made sure a change 'wasn't gonna come' - if at all. 

    The authorities with their mass of firepower and violence can only murder so many without question...and it looks like that time is up.

    Looks like the 'change' was up - hence the wide-eyed mouthy fear from whitey - or rather the un-educational lot who still won't accept they now are a minority.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 3 days ago

    Savagery knows no race.  

    In addition to the comments cataloging White European atrocities, don't forget the right-wing European religions that murdered people because they had other religious orientations:  

    The Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the Vatican's silence during the Holocaust, torture and killing of "witches" and heretics, organized attacks on Jews by Cossacks in Russia, killing Native Americans, enslaving Mexican natives, ad nauseum.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 4 days ago

    What does any of that have to do with how people are today?

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Jas B
    Lv 7
    4 days ago

    You cannot be serious.

    The Roman Empire built on massacres, the British Empire, built on massacres,  the massacres of the native American by the white invaders.  The Spanish inquisition and massacres they carried out to create their empire, the Nazi party who murdered millions etc. etc. etc.

    What on earth did you learn in school as it obviously wasn't history.

    • ...Show all comments
    • Jas B
      Lv 7
      1 day agoReport

      Well I am neither a Yank and as my years on Answers and Questions show, because I do not hide behind anonymity, I am by American standards very left wing.  Like most left wingers I am willing to acknowledge the evils white people have done.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 4 days ago

    In the UK we had the Work House, where we made children and poor adults work to their death.  We used to send children up chimneys and work in Mines and Factories.  So no better really.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    4 days ago

    Whites can also be very savage. Have you never heard of the holocaust.

  • Wilson
    Lv 6
    4 days ago

    You are incredibly wrong 

    If you think the “white race” isn’t barbaric 

    Obviously you don’t know history 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.