So, where is the crime that Trump is accused of?

The witnesses cannot even name a crime.

16 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 weeks ago
    Best answer

    The Dumocrats have made it a crime to investigate if the Dimocrats committed any crime.

  • 3 weeks ago

    I think it's STORMY GOES TO RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND TWEETS TOO MUCH.

  • Neil
    Lv 4
    4 weeks ago

    Witnesses aren’t supposed to name a crime of even determine whether there is a crime. Witness are supposed to tell what they saw and heard.

  • james
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    They have moved on to other things now. Once they seen the charges would not stick.  One of these days they will get him for some high crime like forgetting to tie his shoes & being a safety threat to Americans. They might trip over the laces. 

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Jerry
    Lv 6
    4 weeks ago

    You are obviously unable to interpret and understand the English language.

  • 4 weeks ago

    The idea of trading out military aid for personal and political favors might be acceptable ro Republicans but it's not to everybody else. Attacking witnesses WHILE THEY ARE ON THE STAND might seem to Republicans like the actions of an innocent man but they look criminal to everybody else.

    • don
      Lv 4
      3 weeks agoReport

      So when Biden bragged publicly about blackmailing Ukraine to keep them from investigating his corrupt son...Thats OK with you ? The fakeass witless witness would not have known she was being "attacked" if Schitt had not misquoted a tweet to her....do you not get that ??????????

  • 4 weeks ago

    still looking, ............................

  • 4 weeks ago

    Maybe if you understood how the process works you would be able to write a more pertinent question.  This isn't a criminal trial, it's a hearing to determine if a criminal trial is warranted.  So far, it appears it is.  And Sondland's testimony is going to be a hoot.  He's already amended his statement, public testimony could be very interesting, as trump has already thrown him under the bus so he has nothing to lose by providing incriminating testimony, and much to gain. 

    • don
      Lv 4
      3 weeks agoReport

      IF anybody had any "incriminating evidence" leaky Adam Schitt would have leaked it already to get more time on CNN which he is addicted to.

  • 4 weeks ago

    Fictitious quid pro quo, fictitious bribery, fictitious witness tampering, fictitious transcript.

  • Shilo
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    It is not their job nor expectation to name a crime.......but you knew that.

    • don
      Lv 4
      3 weeks agoReport

      BUT all we got is 3rd hand hearsay gossip and feeeeeeeeeelings. In other words,nothing but a dog and pony show by a bunch of lying traitors.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.