Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 9 months ago

Is it true that the New York Times has retracted the latest Kavanaugh allegations as one user here "John M" is claiming?

Can anyone find the link? I couldn't.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 months ago

    No they have not retracted it. The story is unlikely to be retracted because it's about Deborah Ramirez experiences at Yale. The new allegations in it are really about the fact that someone told the FBI these things. So unless the Bureau comes out and says that this didn't happen then they'd have nothing to retract

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago
    • Lv 6
      9 months agoReport

      The "female student" referenced there is not Ramirez, who does remember the incident and whose account is corroborated by multiple witnesses.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    9 months ago

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-new...

    Here they redacted in the past, so I would not trust the NY slimes.

    But he is likely talking about how the Times deleted a post:

    https://nypost.com/2019/09/15/nyt-deletes-bizarre-...

    • Lv 6
      9 months agoReport

      Your first link is a year old.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bom...

    The alleged victim was not interviewed, and friends of hers who were interviewed said the woman "did not remember the attack."

    The source was a Clinton lawyer.

    eta: The Times' issued a revision, not a retraction, but the revision is so major it guts the article. The revision says: "Editors' Note: An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article."

    Go look at the original article.

    • ...Show all comments
    • zephania666
      Lv 7
      9 months agoReport

      The account is that someone else grabbed Kavanaugh's junk and rub it on her.

      Since she hasn't said it happened, it's just gossip. Until she says it happened, there's nothing there.

      Ramirez's "witnesses" have already been debunked. This new account isn't a witness for her.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 9 months ago

    No. What was retracted, or deleted, was an opinion tweet from the Times that was considered offensive. The allegations of his latest sexual abuse stand.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/new-york-times...

    • ...Show all comments
    • zephania666
      Lv 7
      9 months agoReport

      No retraction, but a major admission added - that the woman involved was not contacted to verify the story, and that the friends who were contacted stated that she denied it.

      In other words... it's fake.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • DIEGO.
    Lv 7
    9 months ago

    good question!!

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    9 months ago

    Only according to "Christian" hypocrites

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Jenny
    Lv 6
    9 months ago

    Do you know how to use a search engine? There are hundreds of stories.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ny+times%3Aretracts%3Aka...

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.