Should Kavanaugh be investigated?
Sen. Kennedy: "Are Ms. Ramirez's allegations about you true?"
Kavanaugh: “None of the witnesses in the room support that. If that had happened, that would have been the talk of campus in our freshman dorm.”
The NYT is now reporting that it was.
- Anonymous10 months ago
He also lied in another way too. One of the Senators, I forget who, asked when he had heard of the allegations from Deborah Ramirez and he said that he first heard of them when they were published in the media. But we have text messages from friends of his from before the story was published where they talked about his people lining them up as witnesses to refute Ramirez claims.
- LollyLv 710 months ago
Why did SCOTUS Kennedy abruptly retire?
What did Kennedy’s son (who worked at Deutche Bank) have to do with this?
Who paid Kavanaugh debt?
- Justin ThymeLv 710 months ago
- SamLv 710 months ago
He's a spoiled little brat who got caught and doesn't want to take responsibility for his actions.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Bernie SandersLv 410 months ago
Unless they have real evidence other than a nothingburger no.
- .Lv 510 months ago
We first must determine if the claims have any factual support at all.
If they do not, move on.
I guess when this blows away like smoke, dems will claim he had a sex change as a teen.
- David B.Lv 710 months ago
The New York Times? Do you mean the paper that always gets their stories right? LOL.
- JeromeLv 610 months ago
Slimy sin of a son..............didn't answer the question.
She didnt ask him that. I see this same pattern on here. A WAY to answer without answering.
I think my native ancestors called this the "forked tongue".......
- AnnLv 610 months ago
No. The libs have found someone else now that the first chick was found to be a lying wacko. Give it up already!
- 10 months ago
The investigation is over. It has been 30+ years Move on. There has been ample time to cook up new phony evidence. Give it a rest.