Is Kim Jong Un's love for his nuclear arsenal comparable to a Conservatives love for their guns?

Fact 1 - Kim Jong Un states he needs those nukes for protection from invasion of hostile forces. Fact 2 - Conservatives state they need their guns for protection from invasion of hostile forces Fact 3 - Kim Jong Un says it's not America's place to tell them how they can/cannot defend themselves Fact 4... show more Fact 1 - Kim Jong Un states he needs those nukes for protection from invasion of hostile forces.

Fact 2 - Conservatives state they need their guns for protection from invasion of hostile forces

Fact 3 - Kim Jong Un says it's not America's place to tell them how they can/cannot defend themselves

Fact 4 - Conservatives say it's not Democrat's place to tell them how they can/cannot defend themselves.

So tell me why Conservatives say it's okay for us to force NK to give up their nukes when they refuse to give up their own weapons? It's all in the name of public safety, right?

Are Conservatives finally understanding the liberal point of view on unnecessary and dangerous weaponry????
Update: Should ever liberal who has ever sent threatening Tweets about Conservatives giving up their guns be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize?
Update 2: I see people arguing Kim Jong Un threatens violence. Yes, he THREATENS. What is worse to you, a threat of violence or an actual act of violence. Un hasn't nuked anyone. People are killed by guns every day in this country.
15 answers 15