Lately, I have been seeing a lot of questions about men hitting women and a lot of people say that it is never okay for a man to hit a woman, even when in self-defense. They say that a real man does not hit a woman, which is true if you are talking about men who beat women just because they can. But a real woman does not hit a man, either. And just because men biologically grow more muscular as it is part of their puberty, does not mean that men should have to forgo their rights to self-defense, simply because it is a woman who is hitting them. Not all women are weak, defenseless, innocent little flowers and, to me, if a woman wants to act tough like a man, she needs to be treated like a man. Anyone who has the audacity to attack/bully/beat up anyone are equally sh*t heads; they all do it because they want to be in control and they all do it because they feel like they can get away with it. Whether they have a v@gina or a pen!s is completely irrelevant. So a question to you white knights and "feminists", how is a woman who hits a man any less worthy of a good beating than a man who hits a woman? I thought you people were for equal rights..... Well, equal rights means equal fights and this is a huge double standard that none of the feminists, men or women, like to bring up. So why is it that a man should not ever, not even in self-defense, hit a woman if they are attacking him?
By the way, I am an egalitarian female and I believe in equal rights as opposed to women's rights.